![]() |
Leeds Liberal Democrats Liberal Democrat Group on Leeds City Council |
![]() |
| Leeds Liberal Democrats | <info@leedslibdems.org.uk> |
Headingley Development Trust given more time to develop school plans5.06.19pm GMT Wed 13th Dec 2006 The Lib Dem-led Council have granted the Headingley Development Trust a six month extension to allow them to develop a business plan for Headingley Primary School. Headingley councillors James Monaghan and Martin Hamilton have welcomed today's decision. Councillor James Monaghan (Lib Dem, Headingley) said "We are pleased that the executive board have overturned officer recommendations and given the Trust an additional six months to work with the council to create a viable plan for keeping the school in community use." Councillor Martin Hamilton (Lib Dem, Headingley) added, "My colleagues and I support the Headingley Development Trust and can assure residents that under no circumstances will we allow Headingley Primary School to become another bar or student accommodation." The Council also agreed to review assets in the whole of the Headingley area. The review will consider if Headingley Primary School might in any event provide a new focus for a community and council provision in the future. Remarkably Labour, who accused the Liberal Democrats of wanting a quick sale of the school, opposed the six month extension agreed today. Cllr Keith Wakefield, Labour leader said that six months was "too long" and the council should sell the building after only three months breathing space.
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Thu 13th Mar 2008: Councillors pledge support to Headingley Development Trust. Wed 12th Sep 2007: Wed 23rd May 2007: Headingley restaurant donates cash to local school. Wed 10th Nov 2004: Back to School for Headingley Councillor. Tue 26th Oct 2004: Headingley Councillor Concerned About Proposed Granby Street Development. Published and promoted by Leeds Liberal Democrats, Chapel House, Manor Gardens, Pool-in-Wharfedale, LS21 1NB. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |